What, if anything, have we got in common with the situation in Ireland?
The Vatican and the faithful
IRELAND
REMAINS overwhelmingly Catholic in identity but has become alienated
from church teaching on sexual matters. The 2011 census found that 84
per cent of people in this State regarded themselves as Catholics.
However, the great majority of Catholics in a more recent survey
rejected papal teaching on who should be priests, on divorce,
homosexuality and contraception. The emergence of such an a la carte
approach reflects a loss of authority within the church caused by sex
abuse scandals and extensive cover-ups, along with the emphasis placed
on personal conscience by Vatican II.
The
fact that a controversial survey involving religious beliefs was
commissioned and published by the Association of Catholic Priests is,
perhaps, the most significant development. It follows the silencing of
Tony Flannery, one of the association’s four leaders, by Rome and the
release of an edited version of a “path of renewal” for the Irish
church, drawn up by Vatican churchmen who visited here last year.
Brendan Hoban may protest they are not dissenting priests and that the
association is merely reflecting the views of parishioners. Rome may not
regard their behaviour in that light.
There
has been an increasing emphasis in recent years on centralised Vatican
discipline and religious orthodoxy. An integral part of that process has
involved the selection and promotion of suitably compliant bishops in
“local churches” throughout the world. Renewed control by Rome and a
crackdown on liberal theological discourse has generated resistance in
some European countries, but with little effect.
A
similar outcome may be expected here. There is no evidence of a
willingness to lift the prohibition on the ordination of women or
married men, or to alter church teaching on sexual or other issues. On
the contrary, the imposition of stricter controls within seminaries; a
careful review of training for teachers of religion in schools and
improved theological formation for wayward thinkers have been identified
as necessary responses to current church difficulties on the road to
renewal.
The
alacrity with which members of the hierarchy quoted from this heavily
edited report, following the implicit challenge from the Association of
Catholic Priests, suggests that battle lines have been drawn. Rome may
not be listening to the views of ordinary Irish Catholics. But there is
nothing new in that. Control, orthodoxy and discipline are the issues at
hand. While praising the vitality of the people’s faith in their
report, Vatican representatives found “a widespread tendency amongst
priests, religious and laity” to hold theological opinions at variance
with “the teachings of the Magisterium”. This was a serious situation
requiring “improved theological formation”. Dissent from fundamental
teachings of the church was not, they declared, an authentic path
towards renewal. Fr Hoban and his colleagues may wish for open dialogue
and for liberal reforms. Instead, they are being asked to listen humbly
to God’s word, as relayed by Rome.
No comments:
Post a Comment